|
String added in the repository |
|
String added in the repository |
| Shortcut | Action |
|---|---|
| ? | Open available keyboard shortcuts. |
| Alt + Home | Navigate to the first translation in the current search. |
| Alt + End | Navigate to the last translation in the current search. |
|
Alt + PageUp or
Ctrl + ↑ or Alt + ↑ or Cmd + ↑ or |
Navigate to the previous translation in the current search. |
|
Alt + PageDown or
Ctrl + ↓ or Alt + ↓ or Cmd + ↓ or |
Navigate to the next translation in the current search. |
|
Ctrl + Enter or
Cmd + Enter |
Submit current form; this works the same as pressing Save and continue while editing translation. |
|
Ctrl + Shift + Enter or
Cmd + Shift +Enter |
Unmark translation as Needing edit and submit it. |
|
Alt + Enter or
Option + Enter |
Submit the string as a suggestion; this works the same as pressing Suggest while editing translation. |
|
Ctrl + E or
Cmd + E |
Focus on translation editor. |
|
Ctrl + U or
Cmd + U |
Focus on comment editor. |
|
Ctrl + M or
Cmd + M |
Shows Automatic suggestions tab. |
|
Ctrl + 1 to
Ctrl + 9 or
Cmd + 1 to Cmd + 9 |
Copies placeable of a given number from source string. |
|
Ctrl + M followed by
1 to 9 or
Cmd + M followed by 1 to 9 |
Copy the machine translation of a given number to current translation. |
|
Ctrl + I followed by
1 to
9 or
Cmd + I followed by 1 to 9 |
Ignore one item in the list of failing checks. |
|
Ctrl + J or
Cmd + J |
Shows the Nearby strings tab. |
|
Ctrl + S or
Cmd + S |
Focus on search field. |
|
Ctrl + O or
Cmd + O |
Copy the source string. |
|
Ctrl + Y or
Cmd + Y |
Toggle the Needs editing checkbox. |
| → | Browse the next translation string. |
| ← | Browse the previous translation string. |
"Beast" is sufficiently vague as to not suggest any particular functionality, while acting as a memorable umbrella term for a family of low level containers and algorithms. People in the know or with a need for low-level network protocol operations will have no trouble finding it, and the chances of luring a novice into a bad experience are greatly reduced. There is precedent for proper names: "Hana", "Fusion", "Phoenix", and "Spirit" come to mind. Is "Beast" really any worse than say, "mp11" for example? Beast also already has a growing body of users and attention from the open source community, the name Beast comes up in reddit posts and StackOverflow as the answer to questions about which HTTP or WebSocket library to use.
"Beast" is sufficiently vague as to not suggest any particular functionality, while acting as a memorable umbrella term for a family of low level containers and algorithms. People in the know or with a need for low-level network protocol operations will have no trouble finding it, and the chances of luring a novice into a bad experience are greatly reduced. There is precedent for proper names: "Hana", "Fusion", "Phoenix", and "Spirit" come to mind. Is "Beast" really any worse than say, "mp11" for example? Beast also already has a growing body of users and attention from the open source community, the name Beast comes up in reddit posts and StackOverflow as the answer to questions about which HTTP or WebSocket library to use.