Zen

Translation

type: paragraph
It is clear from this declaration that the goal of the message model in this library is driven by its use-case (interacting with REST servers) and not to model HTTP messages generally. We note problems similar to the other declarations:
236/2360 · 236

Sign in to save translations.

Key English Chinese (Simplified Han script) Actions
class http_msg_base { public:
class http_msg_base { public:
protected:
protected:
306
}; ```
}; ```
To understand these declarations we need to first understand that cpprestsdk uses the asynchronous model defined by Microsoft's [@https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd504870.aspx [*Concurrency Runtime]]. Identifiers from the [@https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj987780.aspx [*`pplx` namespace]] define common asynchronous patterns such as tasks and events. The `concurrency::streams::istream` parameter and `m_data_available` data member indicates a lack of separation of concerns. The representation of HTTP messages should not be conflated with the asynchronous model used to serialize or parse those messages in the message declarations.
To understand these declarations we need to first understand that cpprestsdk uses the asynchronous model defined by Microsoft's [@https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd504870.aspx [*Concurrency Runtime]]. Identifiers from the [@https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj987780.aspx [*`pplx` namespace]] define common asynchronous patterns such as tasks and events. The `concurrency::streams::istream` parameter and `m_data_available` data member indicates a lack of separation of concerns. The representation of HTTP messages should not be conflated with the asynchronous model used to serialize or parse those messages in the message declarations.
The next declaration forms the complete implementation class referenced by the handle in the public interface (which follows after): ``` /// Internal representation of an HTTP request message. class _http_request final : public http::details::http_msg_base, public std::enable_shared_from_this<_http_request> { public:
The next declaration forms the complete implementation class referenced by the handle in the public interface (which follows after): ``` /// Internal representation of an HTTP request message. class _http_request final : public http::details::http_msg_base, public std::enable_shared_from_this<_http_request> { public:
336
private:
private:
344
};
};
} // namespace details ```
} // namespace details ```
As before, we note that the implementation class for HTTP requests concerns itself more with the mechanics of sending the message asynchronously than it does with actually modeling the HTTP message as described in __rfc7230__:
As before, we note that the implementation class for HTTP requests concerns itself more with the mechanics of sending the message asynchronously than it does with actually modeling the HTTP message as described in __rfc7230__:
* The constructor accepting `std::unique_ptr<http::details::_http_server_context`
* The constructor accepting `std::unique_ptr<http::details::_http_server_context`
* The "cancellation token" is stored inside the message. This breaks the
* The "cancellation token" is stored inside the message. This breaks the
* The `_reply_impl` function implies that the message implementation also
* The `_reply_impl` function implies that the message implementation also
Finally, here is the public class which represents an HTTP request: ``` class http_request { public:
Finally, here is the public class which represents an HTTP request: ``` class http_request { public:
407
private:
private:
412
}; ```
}; ```
It is clear from this declaration that the goal of the message model in this library is driven by its use-case (interacting with REST servers) and not to model HTTP messages generally. We note problems similar to the other declarations:
It is clear from this declaration that the goal of the message model in this library is driven by its use-case (interacting with REST servers) and not to model HTTP messages generally. We note problems similar to the other declarations:
* There are no compile-time customization points at all. The only
* There are no compile-time customization points at all. The only
* The extraction of the body is conflated with the asynchronous model.
* The extraction of the body is conflated with the asynchronous model.
* No way to define an allocator for the container used when extracting
* No way to define an allocator for the container used when extracting
* A body can only be extracted once, limiting the use of this container
* A body can only be extracted once, limiting the use of this container
* Setting the body requires either a vector or a `concurrency::streams::istream`.
* Setting the body requires either a vector or a `concurrency::streams::istream`.
* The HTTP request container conflates HTTP response behavior (see the
* The HTTP request container conflates HTTP response behavior (see the
The general theme of the HTTP message model in cpprestsdk is "no user definable customizations". There is no allocator support, and no separation of concerns. It is designed to perform a specific set of behaviors. In other words, it does not follow the open/closed principle.
The general theme of the HTTP message model in cpprestsdk is "no user definable customizations". There is no allocator support, and no separation of concerns. It is designed to perform a specific set of behaviors. In other words, it does not follow the open/closed principle.
Tasks in the Concurrency Runtime operate in a fashion similar to `std::future`, but with some improvements such as continuations which are not yet in the C++ standard. The costs of using a task based asynchronous interface instead of completion handlers is well documented: synchronization points along the call chain of composed task operations which cannot be optimized away. See: [@http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3747.pdf [*A Universal Model for Asynchronous Operations]] (Kohlhoff).
Tasks in the Concurrency Runtime operate in a fashion similar to `std::future`, but with some improvements such as continuations which are not yet in the C++ standard. The costs of using a task based asynchronous interface instead of completion handlers is well documented: synchronization points along the call chain of composed task operations which cannot be optimized away. See: [@http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3747.pdf [*A Universal Model for Asynchronous Operations]] (Kohlhoff).
English Chinese (Simplified Han script) Actions
} // namespace details ```
} // namespace details ```
As before, we note that the implementation class for HTTP requests concerns itself more with the mechanics of sending the message asynchronously than it does with actually modeling the HTTP message as described in __rfc7230__:
As before, we note that the implementation class for HTTP requests concerns itself more with the mechanics of sending the message asynchronously than it does with actually modeling the HTTP message as described in __rfc7230__:
* The constructor accepting `std::unique_ptr<http::details::_http_server_context`
* The constructor accepting `std::unique_ptr<http::details::_http_server_context`
* The "cancellation token" is stored inside the message. This breaks the
* The "cancellation token" is stored inside the message. This breaks the
* The `_reply_impl` function implies that the message implementation also
* The `_reply_impl` function implies that the message implementation also
Finally, here is the public class which represents an HTTP request: ``` class http_request { public:
Finally, here is the public class which represents an HTTP request: ``` class http_request { public:
It is clear from this declaration that the goal of the message model in this library is driven by its use-case (interacting with REST servers) and not to model HTTP messages generally. We note problems similar to the other declarations:
It is clear from this declaration that the goal of the message model in this library is driven by its use-case (interacting with REST servers) and not to model HTTP messages generally. We note problems similar to the other declarations:
* There are no compile-time customization points at all. The only
* There are no compile-time customization points at all. The only
* The extraction of the body is conflated with the asynchronous model.
* The extraction of the body is conflated with the asynchronous model.
* No way to define an allocator for the container used when extracting
* No way to define an allocator for the container used when extracting
* A body can only be extracted once, limiting the use of this container
* A body can only be extracted once, limiting the use of this container
* Setting the body requires either a vector or a `concurrency::streams::istream`.
* Setting the body requires either a vector or a `concurrency::streams::istream`.
* The HTTP request container conflates HTTP response behavior (see the
* The HTTP request container conflates HTTP response behavior (see the
The general theme of the HTTP message model in cpprestsdk is "no user definable customizations". There is no allocator support, and no separation of concerns. It is designed to perform a specific set of behaviors. In other words, it does not follow the open/closed principle.
The general theme of the HTTP message model in cpprestsdk is "no user definable customizations". There is no allocator support, and no separation of concerns. It is designed to perform a specific set of behaviors. In other words, it does not follow the open/closed principle.
This container is the base class template used to represent HTTP messages. It uses a "tag" type style specializations for a variety of trait classes, allowing for customization of the various parts of the message. For example, a user specializes `headers_container<T>` to determine what container type holds the header fields. We note some problems with the container declaration:
This container is the base class template used to represent HTTP messages. It uses a "tag" type style specializations for a variety of trait classes, allowing for customization of the various parts of the message. For example, a user specializes `headers_container<T>` to determine what container type holds the header fields. We note some problems with the container declaration:
* The header and body containers may only be default-constructed.
* The header and body containers may only be default-constructed.
* No stateful allocator support.
* No stateful allocator support.
* There is no way to defer the commitment of the type for `body_` to
* There is no way to defer the commitment of the type for `body_` to
* The message model includes a "source" and "destination." This is
* The message model includes a "source" and "destination." This is
* The use of `string_type` (a customization point) for source,
* The use of `string_type` (a customization point) for source,
* The library uses specializations of `string<Tag>` to change the type
* The library uses specializations of `string<Tag>` to change the type
There are a few C++ published libraries which implement some of the HTTP protocol. We analyze the message model chosen by those libraries and discuss the advantages and disadvantages relative to Beast.
There are a few C++ published libraries which implement some of the HTTP protocol. We analyze the message model chosen by those libraries and discuss the advantages and disadvantages relative to Beast.
The general strategy used by the author to evaluate external libraries is as follows:
The general strategy used by the author to evaluate external libraries is as follows:
* Review the message model. Can it represent a complete request or
* Review the message model. Can it represent a complete request or
* Review the stream abstraction. This is the type of object, such as
* Review the stream abstraction. This is the type of object, such as
* Check treatment of buffers. Does the library manage the buffers
* Check treatment of buffers. Does the library manage the buffers
* How does the library handle corner cases such as trailers,
* How does the library handle corner cases such as trailers,
Declarations examples from external libraries have been edited:
Declarations examples from external libraries have been edited:
cpp-netlib
cpp-netlib
is a network programming library previously intended for Boost but not having gone through formal review. As of this writing it still uses the Boost name, namespace, and directory structure although the project states that Boost acceptance is no longer a goal. The library is based on Boost.Asio and bills itself as ['"a collection of network related routines/implementations geared towards providing a robust cross-platform networking library"]. It cites ['"Common Message Type"] as a feature. As of the branch previous linked, it uses these declarations: ``` template <class Tag> struct basic_message {
is a network programming library previously intended for Boost but not having gone through formal review. As of this writing it still uses the Boost name, namespace, and directory structure although the project states that Boost acceptance is no longer a goal. The library is based on Boost.Asio and bills itself as ['"a collection of network related routines/implementations geared towards providing a robust cross-platform networking library"]. It cites ['"Common Message Type"] as a feature. As of the branch previous linked, it uses these declarations: ``` template <class Tag> struct basic_message {

Loading…

User avatar admin

String added in the repository
It is clear from this declaration that the goal of the message model in this library is driven by its use-case (interacting with REST servers) and not to model HTTP messages generally. We note problems similar to the other declarations:
It is clear from this declaration that the goal of the message model in this library is driven by its use-case (interacting with REST servers) and not to model HTTP messages generally. We note problems similar to the other declarations:
06/05/2026
Browse all string changes

Things to check

Unchanged translation

Source and translation are identical.

Reset

Glossary

English Chinese (Simplified Han script)
No related strings found in the glossary.

String information

Source string description
type: paragraph
Unit identifier
58676
Source string location
string ID 415
String age
06/05/2026
Last updated
06/05/2026
Source string age
06/05/2026
Translation file QuickBook file
doc/qbk/08_design/2_http_comparison_zh_Hans.qbk, string 61