Loading…
|
Translation uploaded |
|
|
String added in the repository |
|
Things to check
Flags
safe-html, strict-same
Loading…
|
Translation uploaded |
|
|
String added in the repository |
|
The opposite is also true: if there's a `tag_invoke` overload intended for <反之亦然:如果存在适用于<<ref_try_value_to>> 的 tag_invoke 重载,但没有适用于 <<ref_try_value_to>>, but not for <<ref_value_to>>, then calling <<ref_value_to>> will invoke the non-throwing overload, then construct a {ref_system_error} from the {ref_error_code} and throw it. Due to these fallbacks, it is recommended that users provide the overload from this section, rather then the other one, if they ever intend to use <<> 的重载,那么调用 <<ref_value_to>> 时会转而调用不抛异常的重载,随后根据返回的 {ref_error_code} 构造一个 {ref_system_error} 并抛出。由于存在上述回退机制,建议用户在计划使用 <<ref_try_value_to>> 时,优先提供本节所述的不抛异常重载,而非抛异常的重载。</ref_try_value_to></ref_value_to></ref_value_to></ref_try_value_to>>.