en	= Custom Conversions Boost.JSON uses two mechanisms to customize conversion between <<ref_value>> and user types. One mechanism involves specializing type traits. The other one is more powerful and requires defining overloads of `tag_invoke`. Both mechanisms will be further explained in this section.

en	Conversion Traits

en	Previously a number of conversion type traits, like <<ref_is_tuple_like>> or <<ref_is_sequence_like>>, were introduced. The library tries the traits one after another and uses the implementation that corresponds to the first matching trait. In some cases, though, a type would match a trait with a higher priority, but the user intends for it to belong to a lower priority category. If this happens the user can specialize the trait that's not supposed to match for that type to be an equivalent of `std::false_type`.

en	Consider this type:

en	It exposes both a sequence API and a tuple API. But converting from <<ref_value>> to `user_ns::ip_address` would not be able to use implementation for sequences, since those are constructed empty and then populated one element at a time, while `ip_address` has a fixed size of 4. The tuple conversion would fit, though. The only problem is that <<ref_is_tuple_like>> has a lower priority than <<ref_is_sequence_like>>. In order to circumvent this, the user only needs to specialize <<ref_is_sequence_like>> to not match `ip_address`.

en	`tag_invoke` Overloads

en	The second, more powerful approach, is to provide the conversion implementation yourself. With Boost.JSON this is done by defining an overload of `tag_invoke` function (the benefits of this mechanism are outlined in http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1895r0.pdf[C++ proposal P1895]. In essence, `tag_invoke` provides a uniform interface for defining customization points by using argument-dependent lookup to find a viable overload from the point at which it is called. As the name suggests, a tag type is passed as an argument in order to:

en	discard candidates that are unrelated to that particular

en	customization point, and

en	embed the user-defined type into the arguments list (e.g. by using a tag type

en	template such as `value_to_tag<T>`) so that its http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.lookup.argdep#2[associated namespaces and entities] are examined when name lookup is performed.

en	This has the effect of finding user-provided `tag_invoke` overloads, even if they are declared (lexically) after the definition of the calling function.

en	Overloads of `tag_invoke` called by <<ref_value_from>> take the form:

en	``` void tag_invoke( const value_from_tag&, value&, T ); ```

en	While overloads of `tag_invoke` called by <<ref_value_to>> take the form:

en	``` T tag_invoke( const value_to_tag< T >&, const value& ); ```

en	If we implemented conversion for `user_ns::ip_address` manually with this approach, it would look like this:

en	Since the type being converted is embedded into the function's signature, user-provided overloads are visible to argument-dependent lookup and will be candidates when a conversion is performed:

en	Users can freely combine types with custom conversions with types with library-provided conversions. The library handles them correctly: